Search for: All records

Synopsis Classic debates in community ecology focused on the complexities of considering an ecosystem as a super-organ or organism. New consideration of such perspectives could clarify mechanisms underlying the dynamics of forest carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake and water vapor loss, important for predicting and managing the future of Earth’s ecosystems and climate system. Here, we provide a rubric for considering ecosystem traits as aggregated, systemic, or emergent, i.e., representing the ecosystem as an aggregate of its individuals or as a metaphorical or literal super-organ or organism. We review recent approaches to scaling-up plant water relations (hydraulics) concepts developed for organs and organisms to enable and interpret measurements at ecosystem-level. We focus on three community-scale versions of water relations traits that have potential to provide mechanistic insight into climate change responses of forest CO2 and H2O gas exchange and productivity: leaf water potential (Ψcanopy), pressure volume curves (eco-PV), and hydraulic conductance (Keco). These analyses can reveal additional ecosystem-scale parameters analogous to those typically quantified for leaves or plants (e.g., wilting point and hydraulic vulnerability) that may act as thresholds in forest responses to drought, including growth cessation, mortality, and flammability. We unite these concepts in a novel framework to predict Ψcanopy and its approaching of critical thresholds during drought, using measurements of Keco and eco-PV curves. We thus delineate how the extension of water relations concepts from organ- and organism-scales can reveal the hydraulic constraints on the interaction of vegetation and climate and provide new mechanistic understanding and prediction of forest water use and productivity. 

Abstract Plant ecological strategies are shaped by numerous functional traits and their trade‐offs. Trait network analysis enables testing hypotheses for the shifting of trait correlation architecture across communities differing in climate and productivity.We built plant trait networks (PTNs) for 118 species within six communities across an aridity gradient, from forest to semi‐desert across the California Floristic Province, based on 34 leaf and wood functional traits, representing hydraulic and photosynthetic function, structure, economics and size. We developed hypotheses for the association of PTN parameters with climate and ecosystem properties, based on theory for the adaptation of species to low resource/stressful environments versus higher resource availability environments with greater potential niche differentiation. Thus, we hypothesized that across community PTNs, trait network connectivity (i.e., the degree that traits are intercorrelated) and network complexity (i.e., the number of trait modules, and the degree of trait integration among modules) would be lower for communities adapted to arid climates and higher for communities adapted to greater water availability, similarly to trends expected for phylogenetic diversity, functional richness and productivity. Further, within given PTNs, we hypothesized that traits would vary strongly in their network connectivity and that the traits most centrally connected within PTNs would be those with the least across‐species variation.Across communities from more arid to wetter climates, PTN architecture varied from less to more interconnected and complex, in association with functional richness, but PTN architecture was independent of phylogenetic diversity and ecosystem productivity. Within the community PTNs, traits with lower species variation were more interconnected.Synthesis. The responsiveness of PTN architecture to climate highlights how a wide range of traits contributes to physiological and ecological strategies with an architecture that varies among plant communities. Communities in more arid environments show a lower degree of phenotypic integration, consistent with lesser niche differentiation. Our study extends the usefulness of PTNs as an approach to quantify tradeoffs among multiple traits, providing connectivity and complexity parameters as tools that clarify plant environmental adaptation and patterns of trait associations that would influence species distributions, community assembly, and ecosystem resilience in response to climate change.